3 ms·
>Instead you're just talking about a left-wing conspiracy to lie to the public in order to take control of the government. To take control of the government or
by kook_throwaway 5y ago
>Instead you're just talking about a left-wing conspiracy to lie to the public in order to take control of the government.
To take control of the government or for good PR/propaganda? Governments have never had any issues conspiring and lying to the public, remember when Fauci said not to use masks because they didn't help? Or those WMDs that we will surely find any day now?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- betwixthewires 5y agoI'm not who you're replying to, but I'd like to know, what reason would WHO or anyone else have to maintain a high false positive rate under one admin and correct it for the next, other than to lessen the chances of the previous admin's reelection? It wasn't "good PR" it was bad PR, specifically for the previous admin in an election year. That sounds a lot like "lie to the public in order to take control of government" to me.
- apercu 5y agoOr using whatever agency they had to direct the US voters towards what they feel is more effect public health policies and stopping millions of unnecessary deaths? Look, I am not defending anyone, I am saying that _all_ things of this nature are political.