3 ms·
Thank you for the link. I didn't see it anywhere in the story. In fact, the "NASA" link doesn't even leave the site -- it just goes to stories with that tag! G
by shaggyfrog 15y ago
Thank you for the link. I didn't see it anywhere in the story. In fact, the "NASA" link doesn't even leave the site -- it just goes to stories with that tag!
Gruber had a story recently about attribution and credit that Engadget should read: http://daringfireball.net/2011/07/attribution_and_credit http://daringfireball.net/2011/07/attribution_and_credit
- benologist 15y agoThat's the Gruber way. Engadget prefers the AOL Way.
- LoonyPandora 15y agoThere is a link to the press release[1] the bottom left, next to where it says "source" - All Engadget posts have it in the same place. Seemingly it's not prominent enough, but the attribution is certainly there. [1] http://www.nasa.gov/topics/universe/features/universe20110722.html http://www.nasa.gov/topics/universe/features/universe2011072...
- shaggyfrog 15y agoWhile true, it looks identical to the "NASA" link that precedes it that doesn't go externally, and so I skipped over it as I thought it was a duplicate. Besides, is it possible to make an attribution less visible?