>"No-code Bubble raises $100M to make technical co-founders obsolete" PDS: I love this title a lot! <g>. That is because in theory, an infinite series of "Com

>"No-code Bubble raises $100M to make technical co-founders obsolete" PDS: I love this title a lot! <g>. That is because in theory, an infinite series of "Companies that make other companies obsolete" -- could be created! Sort of like Hilbert's Infinite Hotel Paradox (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_paradox_of_the_Grand_Hotel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_paradox_of_the_Gra...)... You have a company that makes technical co-founders obsolete... But then you have a company that makes that company that makes technical co-founders obsolete, obsolete itself! Then of course, you have yet another company -- that makes that previous one obsolete! The whole thing is like a house of cards or a series of dominoes -- Disruptive Technology A takes out Disruptive Technology B -- which has already taken out Disruptive Technology C (well, I guess it wasn't that disruptive, if it got taken out itself! <g>). You know, make the "obsoleters" -- the obsolete ones! <g> And of course, this can apply not just to any business, but to any group or organization as well! Including foreign governments! In other words, why topple or destablize foreign governments -- when you could just create a better one -- and just make the other ones obsolete? <g> I could just picture myself signing up for the CIA: Me: "Yes, I'd like to topple or destabilze foreign governments -- where do I sign up?" CIA: "Oh no, sorry, we don't do that anymore -- that was what we did in the 1950's Cold War Cuban Missle Crisis era... but in 2021 we simply obsolete foreign governments! <g> And once they're obsolete, no one cares about them anymore!" <g> So, philosophically, obsolescence and its relationship to Disruptive Technology, and technology which Disrupts -- the previous Disruptive Technology! And, for how many iterations -- how many disruptions of the disrupters, how many making obsolescences of the obsolete makers -- is sustainable? ? And, who will be the "last man" (obsolescence-maker/disruptive company) -- standing? ? And, all of this, as it relates to the Infinite Hotel Paradox! <g> All submitted for your approval and/or bemusement, and/or approval! <g> Disclaimer: All of above was written for comedy-writing purposes only! <g>