> You still have the freedom to drive your car And with that comes legally enforced consequences if you cause the death of another while exercising that freedo

> You still have the freedom to drive your car And with that comes legally enforced consequences if you cause the death of another while exercising that freedom. That's how we deal with the situation where exercising one's freedoms violates the rights of another. So, given your choice of analogy, in a world where individuals have the freedom to choose not to be vaccinated against a deadly disease, I assume you therefore support the idea that similar legally enforced responsibility should apply to those who exercise their freedom to go about unvaccinated, and in doing so cause the death of another. Or would you care to choose another analogy where you are able to exercise a right in a way that both violates the rights of others while having absolutely no consequences?