Yes, indeed, the post was supposed to be "a story with the twist." Had I known that I was going to have hundreds of thousands of people reading the post, I woul

Yes, indeed, the post was supposed to be "a story with the twist." Had I known that I was going to have hundreds of thousands of people reading the post, I would have followed the standard journalistic practice of writing a summary at the very first section. (See http://t.co/2kJEkJW http://t.co/2kJEkJW for a copy of the post. Note: I asked the post to be taken down until I repost the original article but the journalist is really playing childish games.) I kind of felt this a few hours after the post went out, so I added two clarification points early on in the article: 1. I am not giving up the fight, I will just fight differently, please see the conclusions (link), 2. This was not about NYU and people cheating in business schools; people cheat everywhere: the story gives an explanation why they remain undetected. Oh well, people could not even read these two points. But I want to write stories in my blog, not papers with an abstract, executive summary and table of contents.