3 ms·
The press release from JPL, which is more thorough and detailed: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2011-223 http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?r
by redsymbol 15y ago
The press release from JPL, which is more thorough and detailed:
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2011-223 http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2011-223
- shaggyfrog 15y agoThank you for the link. I didn't see it anywhere in the story. In fact, the "NASA" link doesn't even leave the site -- it just goes to stories with that tag! Gruber had a story recently about attribution and credit that Engadget should read: http://daringfireball.net/2011/07/attribution_and_credit http://daringfireball.net/2011/07/attribution_and_credit
- benologist 15y agoThat's the Gruber way. Engadget prefers the AOL Way.
- LoonyPandora 15y agoThere is a link to the press release[1] the bottom left, next to where it says "source" - All Engadget posts have it in the same place. Seemingly it's not prominent enough, but the attribution is certainly there. [1] http://www.nasa.gov/topics/universe/features/universe20110722.html http://www.nasa.gov/topics/universe/features/universe2011072...
- shaggyfrog 15y agoWhile true, it looks identical to the "NASA" link that precedes it that doesn't go externally, and so I skipped over it as I thought it was a duplicate. Besides, is it possible to make an attribution less visible?
- sigil 15y agoThe JPL release also captions the picture with "This artist's concept illustrates..." Engadget didn't even bother. I really hate it when that gets left out.