> There's no reason to think that needs to be done separately, and in fact that's the kind of things that you'd expect a good model to find on its own. Disagre

> There's no reason to think that needs to be done separately, and in fact that's the kind of things that you'd expect a good model to find on its own. Disagree - learning to classify morphological characteristics is learning the generalizable features. Especially given that some plants are going to have relatively few photos, knowing with high confidence some diagnostic factors and GPS could absolutely outperform the brute force approach. This isn’t about hand tuned features, it’s about predicting the right thing. Also, the approaches aren’t mutually exclusive.