3 ms·
If we’re talking about mobile browsers, Mozilla functionally doesn’t exist. That space is just Safari vs. Chrome(ium). And Apple are not obliged to have 100% f
by mikl 5y ago
If we’re talking about mobile browsers, Mozilla functionally doesn’t exist. That space is just Safari vs. Chrome(ium).
And Apple are not obliged to have 100% feature parity with Chrome.
- afavour 5y agoAnd if we’re talking about iOS browsers, Google doesn’t functionally exist. That space is just Safari. …hence why people complain about Apple’s neglect.
- unethical_ban 5y agoWhy do you say that? Firefox on Mobile exists, and I was under the impression that on Android, it uses its own rendering engine.
- mikl 5y agoIt exists, but its market share is negligible. According to StatCounter, Firefox has a market share of 0.5% on mobile: https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/mobile/worldwide https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/mobile/world... Even on desktop, Firefox is sliding towards irrelevancy, with just 7% market share.
- MiddleEndian 5y agoHonestly it's weird to me that more people don't use Firefox on Android. Only mobile browser that supports uBlock Origin.
- alluro2 5y agoApart from that, it's also fast, rock solid, has UI on the bottom, which is much easier to use, syncs with desktop (if you want that) etc...In general, it's excellent and I don't understand why it isn't hugely more used - unless I concede to the argument that people just don't care about privacy and Google's monopoly...