3 ms·
> This terminology says all I need to know about you - enough said comrade. Some unsolicited advice: if you find yourself explaining at what point you thought
by sennight 5y ago
> This terminology says all I need to know about you - enough said comrade.
Some unsolicited advice: if you find yourself explaining at what point you thought ad-hominem justified switching your brain off - you've made an accidental admission. Also, you seem to think collectivists are anti-state... which is laughably wrong. He didn't mention Murray Rothbard or Friedrich Hayek, so we know he isn't an Ancap, but I definitely wouldn't push all my chips on red.
- ashtonkem 5y agoAlso, “I’ve determined your political opinions from one sentence and therefore I can disregard everything you say” quite the tell that GP was never acting in good faith in the first place. Never mind that they’re extremely confident and laughably wrong about my political ideology. Maybe you can’t reliably guess someone’s political alignment from a single sentence after all?
- sennight 5y agoIt depends on the vocabulary used, there are some words that immediately betray what you spend your time thinking about. The jig is definitely up if you use the words "colonialize" and "future oriented thinking" in the same conversation. But the recognition that cops are state actors... well, lots of different political alignments have a generally suspicious attitude about that. But two exceptions spring to mind: socialists and fascists. Dunno what fascists use in place of "Comrade", but in the interest of symmetry lets go with the obviously wrong "Übermensch".