37 ms·
The key insights seem to be: 1) Despite the chaos, the debris of a collapsed building can be mapped to the structure as it was when standing. 2) All sorts of
by mannykannot 5y ago
The key insights seem to be:
1) Despite the chaos, the debris of a collapsed building can be mapped to the structure as it was when standing.
2) All sorts of information can be used in figuring out where you are - the breed of a dog corpse, a scrap of paper with the name of a victim's rabbi...
3) Be skeptical of secondary sources (estimates of the number of victims...)
4) Bureaucrats will be obstructive just by doing their job as if nothing has happened (we can't tell you that...)
One thing that was not mentioned, but which I imagine was part of the calculus, is what people are likely to do at the first sign of trouble (in this case, noise and shaking) - head for the stairs, go to the window, wait for it to stop...
- beerandt 5y agoThe part about how quickly they figured out the number of missing was actually 97-99, opposed to the "official" number ~150, was really impressive. Of all the things the article covers, I'm most interested to know more about how they interview friends and family so quickly and efficiently, when things are still so raw and emotional. It does say that half the team is dedicated to that task, at least initially.
- vagrantJin 5y ago> scrap of paper with the name of a victim's rabbi... I can definitely see this as plausible.