4 ms·

This is not convincing >It is not reasonable to claim that she could provide, for example, the names of JC’s godparents based upon her recollection of what she

This is not convincing >It is not reasonable to claim that she could provide, for example, the names of JC’s godparents based upon her recollection of what she might have read many years previously in an attempt to maintain a fraud. Yes, it is. That's the best example?

tsimionescu 5y ago
Here is a better quote[0] from Robine in Le Parisien: > On a eu accès à des informations qu'elle seule pouvait connaître, comme le nom de ses professeurs de mathématiques ou de bonnes passées par l'immeuble. On lui a posé des questions sur ces sujets. Soit elle ne se souvenait plus, soit elle a répondu juste. Sa fille n'aurait pas pu savoir ça. "We have had access to information that only she [Jeanne] could have known, such as the name of her math teachers or of nannys who passed through the building. We have asked her questions on such subjects. She either didn't remember them, or she answered correctly. Her daughter [Yvonne] wouldn't have had how to know these things." Things like math teachers' names and nannys seem much more convincing to me. It's not impossible to know them, but I can tell you for sure I don't know such things about my mother, and I am about the age Yvonne was when she died (or when her mother would have died if we believe this theory). [0] https://www.leparisien.fr/societe/jeanne-calment-une-imposture-le-scientifique-qui-a-valide-son-record-s-insurge-30-12-2018-7978578.php https://www.leparisien.fr/societe/jeanne-calment-une-impostu...