3 ms·
>I don't understand the dichotomy here. Let's make it easy then: Without coal as a large % of base load they'd have to shut down a good amount of their manufac
by joecool1029 5y ago
>I don't understand the dichotomy here.
Let's make it easy then: Without coal as a large % of base load they'd have to shut down a good amount of their manufacturing and focus on putting less EV's on the road until they could replace the base load lost from shutting off all their coal production. China is #10 on the list of natural gas reserves, far below what the US or Russia has. At their current consumption they are anticipated to run out in a little over 20 years. I do not think it is a viable strategy to throw tons of natural gas online and rely on Russia when it runs out.
Literally nothing the Chinese do with energy policy right now will appease the west. If they put in more hydro for wind/PV storage western press would print headlines about how the big bad CCP flooded over some villages and are destroying their environment.
- krrrh 5y ago> Literally nothing the Chinese do with energy policy right now will appease the west. Serious development and commercialization of small modular nuclear reactors as an alternative to coal would probably do the trick.