It would be just as easy to take your entire argument and frame it as such: If we have an interview system that works for the vast majority of people, why do w

It would be just as easy to take your entire argument and frame it as such: If we have an interview system that works for the vast majority of people, why do we need to introduce risk by substantially changing it to help very few people? If cheating becomes possible to do easily, your system has disadvantaged people who are honest and refuse to cheat. What are you going to do to ensure that people who are honest are not discriminated against for their honesty? Information technology is already home to a bunch of neurodivergent people. You run into them _way_ more often in IT than you do in just about any other line of work. Do they really need more help getting tech jobs?