4 ms·
My guess is the ‘users didnt know what they were doing defense.’ Not that you can deploy software in a secure by default stance. But once somebody sets up users
by maliker 5y ago
My guess is the ‘users didnt know what they were doing defense.’ Not that you can deploy software in a secure by default stance. But once somebody sets up users and a million other settings inside Active Directory, it’s pretty much bound to be insecure. And then the defense is akin to ‘you werent supposed to crash the car into the tree’.
- bigiain 5y agoI guess they blamed "the army that didn't know what it was doing" for using that bridge wrong too. So it's not _just_ software "engineers"... <grin>