3 ms·

Your reference does not support your claim. It simply shows more right traffic and content. This does NOT prove censorship claims. Simply activity. Here is a d

• jasonlotito 5y ago
  > Your reference does not support your claim. It does. You are just looking at one point of data. And there were many studies on this. That being said, it's still more evidence than the OP provided. > Here is a database of confirmed censorship: Conservative censorship run by a conservative group focused on supporting conservative views. It also uses Project Veritas in its "data" which is a major red flag. They are known, proven liars. And finally, that doesn't support the allegation that conservatives suffer more censorship. So, you've still failed to backup the original argument. I'm done.
  • kokanator 5y ago
    You are using the Origin Fallacy also known as the Genetic Fallacy as an argument[0]. This is not a valid argument. Stating that the information was curated by conservatives does not make it true or false. The claims in the database are researched and vetted. You can view each claim and the research applied to it. If I were to use the Origin Fallacy I could claim that media in general is untrustworthy because it is curated by liberals claiming liberal ideals [1]. Also, you only get to drop the mic when you are a rockstar or Obama. [2] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy [1]https://guides.lib.umich.edu/c.php?g=637508&p=4462444 https://guides.lib.umich.edu/c.php?g=637508&p=4462444 [2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mic_drop https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mic_drop