4 ms·
Perhaps they know what's best for their companies which is why they're not giving their entire wealth to their children. And if they do, if you believe in meri
by bko 5y ago
Perhaps they know what's best for their companies which is why they're not giving their entire wealth to their children.
And if they do, if you believe in meritocracy, it won't matter as that wealth will be squandered away with each subsequent generational transfer, as is often the case.
- BobbyJo 5y agoIt's not about punishing the foolish, it's about maximizing the utilization of societies resources. If you hand ten million dollars to a fool and he squanders it, he's not the only one that loses. The best reason for a meritocracy isn't fairness or justice, it's the benefits it creates for everyone. When someone smart is given control over resources, they create more resources, for themselves and others.
- sokoloff 5y agoWhen that someone smart creates more resources, isn't is likely that they're in a better than average position to plan for its distribution, specifically including placing those resources under the control of smart people to utilize them? I trust the creator of wealth (small, medium, or great) to allocate it intelligently far more than I trust a bureaucracy to do so.
- BobbyJo 5y agoHence the need for a meritocracy.