3 ms·
> For example, 'foo2bar' would not be valid, nor would 'fo911baz'. 'fo23ba23' works. But according to what you wrote, "foo2bar" would be OK? It seems to satisf
by jhgb 5y ago
> For example, 'foo2bar' would not be valid, nor would 'fo911baz'. 'fo23ba23' works.
But according to what you wrote, "foo2bar" would be OK? It seems to satisfy the 'no more than 3 consecutive numbers or letters' requirement.
Also, the obvious answer to this is RLE compressing your passwords. ;) foo2bar could be easily written as f1o221b1a1r1 to make it acceptable.
- alephnan 5y agoSorry off-by-1 error. I meant exclusive of 3, not inclusive. So no more than 2.