2 ms·
In this video, and articles on his website he seems mostly concerned that views about Trump on wikipedia are biased, and there's not enough information that's c
by new299 5y ago
In this video, and articles on his website he seems mostly concerned that views about Trump on wikipedia are biased, and there's not enough information that's critical of Biden. Essentially that there's a left wing bias to wikipedia that represents the "establishment" view:
https://larrysanger.org/2021/06/wikipedia-is-more-one-sided-than-ever/ https://larrysanger.org/2021/06/wikipedia-is-more-one-sided-...
He says this seemingly as a "liberty loving conservative". I don't find the arguments about these particular topics very compelling. And these article are naturally politically charged...
I'd be more interested in a discussion of bias in less politically charged articles, because I'm sure this also exists to some degree.
- stillbourne 5y agoNot to mention his arguments can easily be broken down and expressed as logical fallacies such as false balance. For a professor of epistemology he sure seems to fail in his ability to justify his statements.