You seem to think "peer review" is something magical and absolutely necessary for science, when in fact all it does is give your peers and grant rivals heads up

You seem to think "peer review" is something magical and absolutely necessary for science, when in fact all it does is give your peers and grant rivals heads up on what you are publishing/researching so they can decide if they want to A) allow you to publish B) try and publish their research before you C) just veto your paper and claim it is not good.