3 ms·
That's an alternative only if you don't need a car regularly. You still have to book a vehicle (availability can vary), get to the collection lot, get back home
by varjag 5y ago
That's an alternative only if you don't need a car regularly. You still have to book a vehicle (availability can vary), get to the collection lot, get back home if you need to pick up someone for the trip, take the trip, deliver the passengers, clean up and fuel/charge the vehicle, deliver it back to the parking lot and get back home.
- bartvk 5y agoYes, that's correct. I'd have to hedge my previous statement and say it's only viable for regular car usage if there are multiple shared cars within walking distance. For instance in my street, there's one. And another two in the next street. I've got an 8 year old and it works fine and I book up to three trips per week. But if they weren't within walking range (for a kid) then indeed, it wouldn't be an alternative to owning a car.