3 ms·

Ok I promise I'm going to stop replying to those comments (because as you pointed out they show up on every post), but! Rust is not the only language with a dec

Ok I promise I'm going to stop replying to those comments (because as you pointed out they show up on every post), but! Rust is not the only language with a decent type system out there. I can definitely see some ML/Haskell/Scala/etc. folks who would quickly pick up on all the Future stuff, drawing parallels with their usual language of choice, yet being completely unaware of all the nice tooling around Rust. It's one of its main selling points for me! Re cargo-edit specifically, it also lets me stay in flow while writing these: instead of having to repeat "we'll just edit Cargo.toml, make sure to have that under [dependencies], uh this time we need a feature so the right-hand-side needs to be an object, not a string" - instead I can just copy into the article the actual commands I run on my side, and if a quick paragraph about where that subcommand comes from unblocks even one person then it's worth it.

nindalf 5y ago
I wouldn’t worry too much about it. You have your style, and it clearly works for the people who like your work. Everyone likes different things, and it doesn’t make sense to force homogeneity. It’s ok to cater to niches.
WJW 5y ago
FWIW, I fall exactly into that niche. I've never written a line of Rust in my life but am quite competent with Haskell and Ruby and have dabbled in at least half a dozen others. Seeing everyday `cargo` use made me think of bundler and the Future/Result type signatures were easy to map onto Async/Either and the like. So yes, it's a long article but I didn't mind that in the least. Keep it up!
kelnos 5y ago
Ignore the naysayers in this thread; I don't really get why people think it's ok nitpick how you've decided to present a particular topic that you publish to the world free of charge. It's... kinda rude, IMO. I really enjoyed reading this piece, and had never heard of cargo-edit, so thank you for that. As a Scala person, I've actually struggled with Rust's Future, because it's quite different and requires a new mental model of how things work, which I think you did a great job providing.

nindalf 5y ago

I wouldn’t worry too much about it. You have your style, and it clearly works for the people who like your work. Everyone likes different things, and it doesn’t make sense to force homogeneity. It’s ok to cater to niches.

WJW 5y ago

FWIW, I fall exactly into that niche. I've never written a line of Rust in my life but am quite competent with Haskell and Ruby and have dabbled in at least half a dozen others. Seeing everyday `cargo` use made me think of bundler and the Future/Result type signatures were easy to map onto Async/Either and the like. So yes, it's a long article but I didn't mind that in the least. Keep it up!

kelnos 5y ago

Ignore the naysayers in this thread; I don't really get why people think it's ok nitpick how you've decided to present a particular topic that you publish to the world free of charge. It's... kinda rude, IMO. I really enjoyed reading this piece, and had never heard of cargo-edit, so thank you for that. As a Scala person, I've actually struggled with Rust's Future, because it's quite different and requires a new mental model of how things work, which I think you did a great job providing.