3 ms·
The WSJ doesn’t, but they like scoops because scoops draw traffic and thus, ad revenues. And lots of competitors have an interest in manipulating Apple stock, a
by KuraFire 15y ago
The WSJ doesn’t, but they like scoops because scoops draw traffic and thus, ad revenues. And lots of competitors have an interest in manipulating Apple stock, and they also know that a publisher like the WSJ likes scoops.
- blinkingled 15y agoInteresting that it doesn't get brought up when the manipulating "story" is all pro-AAPL unicorns and panacea.
- Steko 15y agoExample?
- mbrubeck 15y agoActually it does get brought up regularly. A lot of articles were written last year about how Apple itself fed stories to the Wall Street Journal, for example: http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/how_apple_does_controlled_leaks/ http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/how_apple_does_contro...
- blinkingled 15y agoWhat do Controlled Leaks have anything to do with alleged willful downward stock manipulation attempt by WSJ using a story which was later refuted by Jobs?