5 ms·
I used to think this way and realized there were two key things I missed (these are game changers). 1) There are places where the appreciation on the primary r
by brutus1213 5y ago
I used to think this way and realized there were two key things I missed (these are game changers).
1) There are places where the appreciation on the primary residence is not-taxed or taxed at a low rate. I.e. In HCOL areas, people who just bought a house and did nothing much in life (say, drove an Uber just to make ends meet), are worth 1-2 million dollars after tax.
2) When you buy real-estate through a mortgage, you are getting massive leverage on your investment. Would I borrow 5x my principal to buy shares? No! Why is that? If prices go down on shares and I bought on margin, I can get a margin call. If I have a 25-30 year mortgage, I can ride the ups and downs.
These are all my personal experiences .. I followed blogs like greaterfool and totally missed out on some key aspects in life. Owning a home was a much more pleasant life experience than renting for me personally. It is certainly more risky (with respect to restricting job mobility), and more expensive in some respects (utilities). I just want to provide a counterpoint to your argument. Not a financial advisor so pls don't take stock in anything I say :)
- jjeaff 5y agoA few issues with your two points, I think, are that real estate values don't always go up forever, even in hcol areas. It's not always evident what areas are about to have years and years of high growth. Now, buying a home for your own personal use and as an investment is a better proposition. But you can only have one of those and you can't get such low interest rates and low money down for investment properties as you can for a personal home mortgage.