3 ms·
I’m not ignoring this. You are making the moral assumption that just because someone has a better negotiating position in a situation there is a moral obligati
by sergefaguet 5y ago
I’m not ignoring this.
You are making the moral assumption that just because someone has a better negotiating position in a situation there is a moral obligation to intervene in some centralized way to “correct the imbalance.”
I am denying your assumption and presenting a different point of view which has no less of a claim to morality or truth than yours.
- thethethethe 5y agoI never made a moral assumption in my response. I was just stating that the unions and cartels are not very similar for a reason that you admitted exisists in you response in your original comment you said: > When this tactic is applied to any other factor of production it is called a “cartel” and engaged in “market manipulation.” My comment was simply explaining the reason why this is the case