4 ms·
The 127 I get. This one seems odd though.
by edoceo 5y ago
The 127 I get. This one seems odd though.
- toast0 5y agoIt seems to me (based on reported behavior), that Linux is special casing the loopback interface: when you add an address with a netmask to the loopback interface, it considers all of those addresses as local addresses. As opposed to a normal interface where only the specific address is a local address, but the rest of the network specified are accessible through that interface. Maybe one /8 wasn't enough addresses for you, so you added more? Doesn't seem like an unreasonable way to behave, even if it's different than BSD behavior; it certainly makes it easier to use lots of loopback addresses.