There you go again with the groundless "most," not to mention your thinly veiled bias against "activists." >The recipient of the violence (be it property or a

There you go again with the groundless "most," not to mention your thinly veiled bias against "activists." >The recipient of the violence (be it property or a person) is not relevant. The law disagrees, for decades if not centuries, and your sense of the relationship between assault and violence are misinformed, if not completely upside-down, backwards, and possibly with i's dotted with flowers.