> Edit: Anyone downvoting this also simply doesn't understand how serious this privacy leak really is. Shame on you too. Wouldn't showing a warning suggesting

> Edit: Anyone downvoting this also simply doesn't understand how serious this privacy leak really is. Shame on you too. Wouldn't showing a warning suggesting not to post sensitive images while the bug is being investigated be better than straight up shutting down the service while solving the privacy issue? Wouldn't closing the service have made people leave for other (probably worse) services, the one relying on privacy, privacy-minded people and "regular users" alike, and have worse consequences for privacy than this bug? (not currently a Signal user, and I did not downvote your comment)