3 ms·
You are arguing against a hypothetical situation of your opponent's creation. This is like when Ross tried to beat Chandler at Cups
by ChrisKnott 5y ago
You are arguing against a hypothetical situation of your opponent's creation. This is like when Ross tried to beat Chandler at Cups
- hutrdvnj 5y agoI go to bed now and dream of a universe in which NullPrefix is Ross and continues to argue endlessly.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- NullPrefix 5y agoI'll argue with anyone about anything. For free.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- webmaven 5y ago> I'll argue with anyone about anything. For free. No, you won't.
- NullPrefix 5y agoObviously that was a hyperbolic statement.
- webmaven 5y agoDon't argue with me!
- NullPrefix 5y agoI am curious how different that alternative universe needs to be for my argument to be invalid.
- desine 5y agoIt's not that your argument was incorrect. It's that it is tangential to the parent comment. hnarn was not making the point of something being rare, they were demonstrating that a developer can estimate the rarity based on the conditions that trigger it. The rarity itself is no matter. Arguing over small semantic or circumstantial differences is often considered impolite