4 ms·
Well maybe it did so because it wanted to take an undue advantage of its market share. Now is that anti monopolisitc? Sure it is. Off with their head I say. Go
by Andrew_Quentin 15y ago
Well maybe it did so because it wanted to take an undue advantage of its market share. Now is that anti monopolisitc? Sure it is.
Off with their head I say. Google-s I mean.
- panacea 15y agoI say... if HN wanted to discuss Google changing their front-page search results to exclude realtime/twitter-like stuff this isn't the article to promote discussion. But I suspect it's only on the front page because it's a topical (and terrible) news story that couldn't be on the homepage without some slight tech-angle to make it HN valid. Cynical.