> prices in a time-series are highly linked to the previous data point. And how many data points are there in seven years of BTC? > seems to falsely imply tha

> prices in a time-series are highly linked to the previous data point. And how many data points are there in seven years of BTC? > seems to falsely imply that these are remotely comparable. Why is it "false" that they are "remotely comparable" if we are looking at time series of security prices? You are long on the insults and short on the reasoning. Given the author is a well-known statistician and you are some anonymous individual, I'm going with them.