There's another analysis (and a better explanation) on this blog - including a section which looks solely at what happens "If you remove the Elgazzar paper from

There's another analysis (and a better explanation) on this blog - including a section which looks solely at what happens "If you remove the Elgazzar paper from their model..." https://gidmk.medium.com/is-ivermectin-for-covid-19-based-on-fraudulent-research-5cc079278602 https://gidmk.medium.com/is-ivermectin-for-covid-19-based-on... "There’s no benefit seen whatsoever for people who have severe COVID-19, and the confidence intervals for people with mild and moderate disease become extremely wide." Later there's another section in the blog post - but it's not that he removes a second paper. Since it's supposed to be a meta-analysis of all the available studies, "If you include another study that was published after the Bryant meta-analysis came out, which found no benefit for ivermectin on death, the benefits seen in the model entirely disappear."