3 ms·
Agree on the high refresh rate point. I used to have a 1080p 144 Hz monitor and it transformed online gaming, but was also noticeable on the desktop. However,
by diarrhea 5y ago
Agree on the high refresh rate point. I used to have a 1080p 144 Hz monitor and it transformed online gaming, but was also noticeable on the desktop.
However, I then went 32" 4k and can never go back. 4k is simply amazing, and today you still have to choose: either high Hz or high resolution. You can't (reasonably) have both, and I choose 4k! Looking forward to the day 4k 144Hz becomes reasonable.
- LeSaucy 5y agoIf the larger size of 48” isn’t a deal breaker, the LG CX/C1 make amazing desktop displays- 4K120 + OLED response times.
- washadjeffmad 5y agoEhh maybe true like four years ago. I've had a 4K 120Hz 10bit 4:4:4 panel since 2014 for under $1K, and TVs that do 4K 120Hz are cheap today (like 55" for $350). My display also does 1080_240 and 720_540, which is just silly.
- noisem4ker 5y agoSuch high values found on TVs are typically a product of motion interpolation and backlight strobing. They may not be considered "true" refresh rates and be just taken at face value.