3 ms·
Here we are 20 years later and we still can’t agree what agile even means. That is where it failed. It’s not concrete enough, and maybe it was never meant to b
by shsbdncudx 5y ago
Here we are 20 years later and we still can’t agree what agile even means. That is where it failed. It’s not concrete enough, and maybe it was never meant to be.
I feel like they had a great idea, gave birth to something, but then failed to nurture it and we are still evolving a solution. Ok we got scrum but we all know that’s a complete shit show.
What agile is really missing is that it doesn’t touch on leadership. We like to blame management and say they should let us do what we know, but we don’t lead. Decentralised control only works when everyone leads.
Let’s add a line to the manifesto and fix it:
“Lead from the bottom over centralised control”