4 ms·
"with certain customers who are at higher risk of fraud — including all state unemployment agencies it works with — facial recognition. If a person filing for u
by yadaeno 5y ago
"with certain customers who are at higher risk of fraud — including all state unemployment agencies it works with — facial recognition. If a person filing for unemployment benefits fails the facial recognition step a few times, they'll be directed to a video chat where they must show identification..."
This sounds reasonable given the current situation. Washington state alone lost ~1b to fraudulent claims during the pandemic (that's almost $3000 per taxpayer). If you are going to allow people to file online, you absolutely need to verify their identity.
That being said. Verifying by mailing address or in person seem more effecvive, fraud resistant, auditable, reliable, don't rely on a contractor etc.
Unfortunately it seems thay many of the pandemic era "temporary" solutions are simply going to become the norm because of inertia.
- TchoBeer 5y ago>Washington state alone lost ~1b to fraudulent claims during the pandemic Wild. Where did you see that?
- yadaeno 5y ago1.1b seems to be the upper bound, but potentially closer to ~640m according to the Seattle times. www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/auditor-state-unemployment-system-wholly-unprepared-for-fraud-one-agency-employee-under-criminal-investigation/%3famp=1
- devoutsalsa 5y agoQueue HN pedantry in 3... 2... 1... $1_000_000_000 in claims 7_615_000 WA state population 1_000_000_000 / 7_615_000 = 131.319763624 $/person
- yadaeno 5y agoI multiplied by 3 at the end since kids and unemployed don't pay taxes but you're right ty.