3 ms·
It should be much more harsh. If you own a building where a store should be but aren't using it as such you should be made to pay an insane tax for lowering the
by 6510 5y ago
It should be much more harsh. If you own a building where a store should be but aren't using it as such you should be made to pay an insane tax for lowering the value of the entire shopping area.
- 6510 5y agoI live in a block with around 6000 people and no stores. That what should be the mall was held hostage for decades by a supermarket chain who have a store 10 km from here. They didn't want their competitors to have it. Eventually the entire thing was changed into a giant day care.