4 ms·
>It's going to be hard to keep software out of the wrong hands. If your entire business model is to sell covert intrusive software to powerful entities, then t
by ILMostro7 5y ago
>It's going to be hard to keep software out of the wrong hands.
If your entire business model is to sell covert intrusive software to powerful entities, then the argument is irrelevant.
- mikem170 5y agoI don't think that I understand what you are saying. In my comment I meant to say that keeping software out of the wrong hands was ultimately not possible, and thought it would be better the give people more secure and more private means to communicate (something like pinephone, tor, matrix, etc). Your first clause seems to agree with the first half of what I said (can't stop bad software), but then you said it was irrelevant. Maybe irrelevant to NSO, as long as they can get away with it? Or irrelvant to something else I said? (I'm not opposed to going after NSO, also. Power to the people. But it seems many governments care about our data more than they care about our votes.)
- ILMostro7 5y agoIrrelevant to the argument as it pertains to NSO. Thanks for clarifying.