You're missing Rayiner's point. Stuyvesant kids have a 1466 ((<https://brainly.com/insights/best-worst-public-high-schools-us-by-sat-act-scores https://brainly.

You're missing Rayiner's point. Stuyvesant kids have a 1466 ((<https://brainly.com/insights/best-worst-public-high-schools-us-by-sat-act-scores https://brainly.com/insights/best-worst-public-high-schools-...>)), not 1300; Rayiner understated it) average SAT score. Either * families, often very poor Asians as stated, prioritized saving up for test prep, or * the kids didn't need it and got the score anyway. Which would you prefer to support your ideological priors?