3 ms·
No, Windows has by far more investment into security and a far better culture. Linux has a multiple-decades-long history of saying that security is not importan
by staticassertion 5y ago
No, Windows has by far more investment into security and a far better culture. Linux has a multiple-decades-long history of saying that security is not important and has had to be dragged kicking and screaming to modernity.
SELinux is just an LSM built decades ago, I wouldn't say that somehow proves that upstream cares about security.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]