I don't think that's the problem, the problem is that progress in cameras is parallel to progress in drones and CGI, so we always will be able to explain away e

I don't think that's the problem, the problem is that progress in cameras is parallel to progress in drones and CGI, so we always will be able to explain away everything. If there is something to this phenomenon, no individual video is going to be enough. For instance, if we see something like these, the explanation is going to be drones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVTlN41Mr9w https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVTlN41Mr9w https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5CSReaPNcg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5CSReaPNcg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a95YERVRBM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a95YERVRBM If we see something like these, CGI, I suppose: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wskl8NJ2wU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wskl8NJ2wU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE-Yrv1-chI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE-Yrv1-chI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JRi7VUZTcA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JRi7VUZTcA This one is taken by a military grade camera at night, I suppose it could be a drone or a bird: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1qiZ_L8wX4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1qiZ_L8wX4 Because it's not reproducible it's always possible to explain away everything. It's an epistemology nightmare but I find it very interesting, specially when you have testimonies from people that you don't have a reason to doubt. I have to think if, maybe, our priors are too strong in one direction.