2 ms·
This thread is not about a tort. The article doesn't mention it (to my recollection) and your post didn't either. Can you clarify why you think it does?
by _-david-_ 5y ago
This thread is not about a tort. The article doesn't mention it (to my recollection) and your post didn't either. Can you clarify why you think it does?
- ashtonkem 5y ago> Yes, it may be illegal, in civil court. It's the tort of "public disclosure of private facts". Under California law, the public disclosure of private facts is defined as (1) a public disclosure of (2) private facts about an individual (3) that would offend the average person, that (4) was not of legitimate public concern; and (5) where defendant published private facts with reckless disregard for their truth or falsity It’s right there at the top. I’m actually kind of alarmed that you can’t see that.