I'm sorry but frankly no. You are so demonstrably incorrect on this assertion. There are many areas where RT report really well and have been rewarded. I howev

I'm sorry but frankly no. You are so demonstrably incorrect on this assertion. There are many areas where RT report really well and have been rewarded. I however wouldn't ever trust them as a reputable source of the status of the Russian vaccination program or Russian voting. Frankly this is common sense, read the foreign reporting on any issue in a country to balance what is correct and what is being magnipulated regardless of who is reporting on it. This is how grown ups are supposed to use the Internet rather than falling into a bubble of trusting 3or4 sites as gospel. The same way I would be weary of the BBC reporting on any topic remotely close to the political arena in the uk at the time. The beeb are getting demonstrably concerningly biased their manipulation or changes to page ranking within their site. They regularly do publish quoting lancet pages without directly linking to them, the story then falls out of the ranking within 24hr and the external index engines struggle to find the static published content they still have. It's they're it's "just gone". This is not a result of reasonable reporting or sensible journalism. When the article is mistitled for clicks this is even worse. I'm being nice to aunty beeb here. I want it to exist. But pretending it's currently an infallable entity and is unbiased is an insult to its heritage.