3 ms·

I find it pretty interesting that this comment would downvoted

• dwater 5y ago
  It is a very simplistic, low-effort idea with no supporting argument. It does not take much thought to come up with reasons why society would not permit every single individual complete unrestricted domain over their property. Like, what if any of the actions you take on your property have an effect on your neighbors?
  • nemo44x 5y ago
    It was within the context of forcing a property owner to rent their property of be fined. Not within a context of a property owner should be able to do anything on their property. So the idea was presented succinctly. I really don’t think I need a long explanation on why it’s an absurd idea to force someone to sell their space at a price lower than they think it’s worth.