3 ms·
Did anybody find it weird that a series that ended with a rousing affirmation of the value of truth was full of so much gratuitous falsehood? I was just readin
by pasabagi 5y ago
Did anybody find it weird that a series that ended with a rousing affirmation of the value of truth was full of so much gratuitous falsehood?
I was just reading the article and a name popped up: "Mikhail Ivanovich Shchadov", who looked pretty flash in the series, so I looked the real guy up, and one commenter had this to say:
"Mikhail Ivanovich Shchadov, the coal industry minister, is portrayed as a young, weak and fop man who allegedly has nothing to do with coal mining and is far apart from the working class. In real life Shchadov was a strong, rigorous and togated minister who had worked in the coal industry since the age of 15. He was a former miner and mechanic in Siberia."
Literally every time I've looked up something from that series, this has happened. And I've looked up a lot of stuff, because a lot of it didn't seem realistic.
I get trying to make a story dramatic, but when the whole thrust of the movie is about the price of lies, what are we supposed to think? Genuinely baffled.
- lewiscollard 5y ago> Did anybody find it weird that a series that ended with a rousing affirmation of the value of truth was full of so much gratuitous falsehood? That rousing affirmation of the truth being in a courtroom scene that never happened - quite so, though "weird" doesn't quite cover it. On the subject of the individuals portrayed, I thought its depiction of Anatoly Dyatlov particularly slanderous.