That makes about as much sense as current scientific naming. The way we name people makes sense - with a family name, and an individual name. Conversely it ma

That makes about as much sense as current scientific naming. The way we name people makes sense - with a family name, and an individual name. Conversely it makes no sense for scientific objects. As an example, 'Higgs boson' does not make sense. 'Higgs' gives no clue what the particle is. Is Peter Higgs a worthy person? Etc. Since it is the mass-carrying particle, it should clearly be called the 'masson', 'massion' or similar.