3 ms·
Thats true,part of it maybe that we were a bit tired of FB . Also there was a sense of hype around the launch of Google + which we didnt have in Wave or Buzz.
by aditiyaa1 15y ago
Thats true,part of it maybe that we were a bit tired of FB . Also there was a sense of hype around the launch of Google + which we didnt have in Wave or Buzz.
Even though I use FB more than any other social networking websites, I still think many of their features suck a lot (photo album, chat). It bothers me that they have been in business for so long , but they have failed to incorporate better features . For me the way FB was frantically responding to Google+ seems silly. They should have done these way before. Can anyone explain why FB had to wait for adding new features until Google+ was launched.
- Ronkdar 15y agoGoogle Wave and Buzz were published with minimal fanfare, and used a paradigm unfamiliar to Facebook users. Google+ is so familiar, and became so quickly wrapped up with everything else in your Google account, that transitioning and participating were easy.
- FaceKicker 15y agoIn Google+'s case, would you say that a single blog post on the day it launched was anything beyond "minimal fanfare"?
- bonch 15y agoThe countless articles of hype on all the tech sites certainly qualify. HN was posting a constant stream of Google+ links every day.