4 ms·
Not sure what data you're talking about. What I've seen so far: SAT <-> Income are correlated => let's not rely on SAT? That's such a BS argument. Anything rel
by starchild_3001 5y ago
Not sure what data you're talking about. What I've seen so far: SAT <-> Income are correlated => let's not rely on SAT? That's such a BS argument.
Anything related to income will be (statistically speaking) associated with intelligence and other personal traits (perseverance etc). Any of this will be obviously correlated with your kid's SAT --- it's called genetics.
Any other, more sensible data to look at?
- dsr_ 5y agoIt's never the kid's income, though. It's always the parents' income.
- tdeck 5y ago> Anything related to income will be (statistically speaking) associated with intelligence and other personal traits (perseverance etc). Any of this will be obviously correlated with your kid's SAT --- it's called genetics. No, it's called social darwinism.
- starchild_3001 5y agotdeck, genetics is a statistical phenomena. Your parents being smart/strong/fast runner/good in music etc doesn't turn you into one of these instantly, but they're statistically correlated with you having similar abilities and traits. How can you argue against this? Isn't this obvious? Isn't this what genetics is all about --- parents' genes being passed to offspring? You're either blinded by your ideology... or maybe don't understand biology.