The question of data collection could use a little reverse consideration: what could Audacity possibly collect that would be of interest to law enforcement? The

The question of data collection could use a little reverse consideration: what could Audacity possibly collect that would be of interest to law enforcement? The only thing I can think of is IP address with a timestamp (which I'm not sure would be admissible as evidence anywhere) given their current stance, or....more? They want to add video so they have to be prepared for e.g. pedo interest? The circumstances in the movie "Blow Up?" I really can't think of anything from the real world. Beyond that, there's nothing that requires them to allow for this in their TOS. There's no loose end by not including it; it's not a 't' to be crossed or an 'i' to be dotted. I'm eager to be corrected, but I just don't see why they'd need to change the TOS at all except to replace some ownership info.