3 ms·
Fun fact - when your eyes are performing a saccade (ie, moving around a scene) they discard a lot of detail in the visual input to avoid blurs ([0]). If you co
by joshmarlow 5y ago
Fun fact - when your eyes are performing a saccade (ie, moving around a scene) they discard a lot of detail in the visual input to avoid blurs ([0]).
If you could detect saccades and dim/turn off the lights, I wonder what the perceptual experience would be!
[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saccade#Saccadic_masking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saccade#Saccadic_masking
- stavros 5y agoUnfortunately I think the latency would be too great for that, but it's definitely an interesting notion.
- joshmarlow 5y agoYou're probably right. I wonder if you could get enough of a speed improvement using an FPGA for the image processing?
- stavros 5y agoI think most of the latency was actually in acquiring the image from the camera and sending the on/off command over the network. Processing was pretty fast, IIRC.