5 ms·
Your statement is what’s wrong with how history is viewed. I wasn’t talking specifically to the article, but the comments. He’s being glorified for his personal
by jbluepolarbear 5y ago
Your statement is what’s wrong with how history is viewed. I wasn’t talking specifically to the article, but the comments. He’s being glorified for his personality and his sexist views are were very much apart of his personality. Don’t erase him from history, but also don’t act like he is some role model.
- serverholic 5y agoPlease show me where anyone in this thread is glorifying anything close to sexism.
- jbluepolarbear 5y agoYou have poor reading comprehension. Glorying him and his personality includes his sexist personality as well.
- serverholic 5y agoIt’s really not. I wouldn’t have known he was sexist until you said something.
- jbluepolarbear 5y agoYou’re wrong, please stop responding. And I know your downvoting me. Your accounts over the threshold and my top comment is flagged, so it’s you.
- philipkglass 5y agoPeople cannot downvote direct replies to their own comments. The person you are arguing with could not have downvoted any comments in this chain except the top one.
- serverholic 5y agoI didn’t downvote you and I didn’t flag you. Have a nice day.
- dang 5y agoPersonal attacks will get you banned here. Please don't cross into name-calling or ideological warfare either. We're trying for something else on this site! If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.