4 ms·

I've read it before, but it's always such a fun read. The author got Feynman's speaking style down perfectly.

• goodcanadian 5y ago
  Well, I think it gets it wrong when it comes to the safety issue question. Something being possible, even if unlikely, is obviously more dangerous than something being impossible. Feynman would definitely understand that even if he insisted that the main reason for the shape of the cover is the shape of the hole (which is probably true). EDIT: Assuming Feynman is deliberately being obtuse, he might point out that, while unlikely, if the round cover is placed on its edge, it could roll away potentially injuring someone or damaging property.
  • deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]
  • JadeNB 5y ago
    > Something being possible, even if unlikely, is obviously more dangerous than something being impossible. Feynman would definitely understand that even if he insisted that the main reason for the shape of the cover is the shape of the hole (which is probably true). This is a very good point for someone who is known, among other things, for his O-ring demonstration (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_Commission_Report#Role_of_Richard_Feynman https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_Commission_Report#Role_...).
    • hungryforcodes 5y ago
      Love the o-ring story. One of the reasons he's my hero.